Commit Graph
31 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 3c0babfef1 fix(pid): signal lines carry no fabricated number; a bubble exits towards the first waypoint
An ISA-5.1 signal line has no pipe line number, yet every pneumatic /
electric line got the bare sequence as its number and a label, and ate a
process sequence number. Signal classes now leave line_number None (a
verbatim one is still honoured), seq None, no label. A radial port aimed
at the far end even with waypoints, so the first segment cut through the
bubble; aim_points (lines.py) aims at the first/last waypoint for both
draw_line and the dry run.

Merge note: benchmarks/adapters/autocad_mcp_pro.py (final group's file)
had its two _task_pid_roundtrip assertion lines moved to the new truth —
the signal row is unnumbered, the connector row is 3.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
2026-09-21 22:24:03 +03:00
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 2e101b95e2 fix(task-5): a rollback that fails after a cancellation no longer kills the session, and the COM rollback goes back to an UNDO Mark instead of prompting
Two review findings on 32821c6.

1. Once the shielded rollback body runs after a real client cancellation it
   can fail (the COM hard timeout, _safe_send_command's own deadline, an
   ezdxf quarantine refusal). That RuntimeError escaped run_spec as an
   ordinary error and the mcp lowlevel server, which had already answered
   the cancelled request, tried to respond a second time: `assert not
   self._completed` in mcp/shared/session.py escaped the server task group
   and the whole session died (measured through the real transport: the next
   system_status was never answered and Client.__aexit__ re-raised the
   AssertionError). run_spec now decides by the exception it is handling:
   after a cancellation the rollback error is logged and the cancellation is
   what propagates, so the SDK's cancellation suppression applies; after any
   other error the rollback error propagates as before, with the original
   chained as its context.

2. The docstring promised the rollback on both engines, but on the live
   AutoCAD 2026 ComBackend.transaction_rollback sent `_UNDO B` with no UNDO
   Mark in the stack (StartUndoMark/EndUndoMark form an undo *group*, not a
   Mark), AutoCAD answered "This will undo everything. OK? <Y>", SendCommand
   blocked at that prompt, _run gave up after 60 s, the entities stayed and
   every COM client was rejected until a human pressed ESC. transaction_begin
   now types `_.UNDO _M` before StartUndoMark (refused with ok:false while
   CMDACTIVE, where the Mark would be swallowed as input), and
   transaction_rollback ends the group and sends `_.UNDO _B`, which returns
   exactly to that Mark - also on an empty transaction, where `_UNDO 1` would
   be one step too many. A rollback with no transaction is refused the way the
   headless engine refuses it, because an unmarked Back is that prompt.
   Measured with the real ComBackend in a scratch Documents.Add() document on
   the running AutoCAD 2026 (closed with Close(False)): begin 31 ms ->
   entity_create_line + circle -> rollback 63 ms -> 3 entities back to 1,
   CMDACTIVE 0, no prompt; an empty begin/rollback leaves the older line;
   begin/commit unchanged.

Tests: the two failure modes on run_spec (anyio scope cancellation with a
raising rollback completes the task group and logs; a ValueError with a
raising rollback still raises the rollback error with the ValueError as
context), the real-transport case (client.cancel mid-run, rollback raises,
the next request is answered, cleanup through the real rollback), the COM
shape now pins `_.UNDO _M, StartUndoMark, EndUndoMark, _.UNDO _B`, and
test_com_sprint3 grows a Mark-keeping fake document whose unmarked Back
fails the way the prompt does: begin before the group, rollback consumes the
Mark, rollback without a transaction sends nothing, begin refuses on
CMDACTIVE.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
2026-09-21 21:46:08 +03:00
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 32821c6410 fix(task-5): pid_from_spec shields its rollback so a real client cancellation rolls the sheet back on both engines
The MCP SDK cancels a request by cancelling an anyio scope, and anyio
cancellation is level-triggered: task.cancel() is re-issued on every loop
iteration while the task is inside the cancelled scope. run_spec's
`except BaseException: await backend.transaction_rollback()` was therefore
cancelled at its first await, before the rollback body ran. Measured through
the real transport (fastmcp.Client + notifications/cancelled): five symbols
left in an open transaction on ezdxf; on the COM shape EndUndoMark / _UNDO B
never sent while the backend's `finally` already cleared _transaction_active,
so the next transaction_begin nested a StartUndoMark. A native Task.cancel()
(what the plan's Step-4 note reasoned about) is delivered once and clears,
which is why raising CancelledError from a mock passed trivially.

The rollback now runs inside anyio.CancelScope(shield=True). The COM hard
timeout (asyncio.wait_for inside ComBackend._run) still fires inside the
shield, measured at 0.62 s with a 0.5 s deadline, so a hung rollback cannot
freeze the server.

Tests: the mock-raise test is replaced by real cancellations that fail on the
unshielded code — a cancelled anyio task-group scope (parametrized alongside
the native Task.cancel() case), the real transport via Client.cancel(request
id) polled mid-run, and the COM shape (real ComBackend._run, a real
single-thread executor and the real transaction_rollback over a recording
ActiveX document, with a call in flight when the scope is cancelled) which
asserts StartUndoMark, EndUndoMark, _UNDO B land and the next begin is fresh.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
2026-09-21 17:01:17 +03:00
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 ac1fba80b7 fix(pid): pid_from_spec refuses non-finite numbers by path and rolls back on any interruption
_num let NaN/inf (and a 400-digit int, as OverflowError) through, so an
INSERT was placed at [nan, 0] and the refusal, when it came, named the
line instead of equipment[0].x. run_spec caught Exception only, so a
CancelledError mid-run left the placed symbols inside an open transaction
(an open undo mark on COM). Finite check in _num; except BaseException.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
2026-09-18 10:51:45 +03:00
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 d80ae17411 feat(pid): pid_from_spec — a whole P&ID in one transaction, graph and critique returned
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
2026-09-16 12:10:14 +03:00
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 6aded6bbf0 fix(task-16): hints only name ports pid_line_draw accepts; signal_unknown is judged as a signal line
Two review findings on the P&ID critique focuses.

The graph's own `nearest` is computed over every port in its grid, including
the `p1..pn` ports it invents on a promoted unknown_block, so a free end near
a sheet frame was hinted to connect to the frame — a call `pid_line_draw`
refuses, since the frame carries no ACADMCP_PID payload. Every dangling row
is now re-hinted over connectable ports only (catalogue / XDATA nodes,
declared ports), so every hint is executable.

`signal_unknown` — the class the reader assigns to a signal-layer line whose
exact class it cannot tell — was skipped by the incompatibility check
because it is not in the drawable class table. Its kind is still signal, so
a signal-layer line ending on a process port is now an error as spec §11.1
requires; only an unclassified line is skipped.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
2026-09-16 12:01:37 +03:00
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 3c4fbf6c42 fix(task-16): a P&ID line ending on an unknown_block is dangling — a 0.3 guess suppresses no finding either
715c8ef applied the evidence rule in one direction only: an `unknown_block`
(any INSERT a plain LINE happened to touch, filed at 0.3) could not *create*
a pid_dangling_line, but it could still *suppress* one. build_graph attaches
a line end that lands on such a box and invents port `p1` at the line's own
end, so `graph["dangling"]` is empty and `_dangling`, which only read that
list, called the line connected. A process line from P-101's discharge to
the sheet frame (a CTO title block is a block reference) passed
drawing_critique and the drawing_finalize gate; the same line stopping 2 mm
short of the frame was an error. Spec §11.1 says the end resolves to nothing
in both cases — a frame, a logo or a note symbol is nothing the drawing
vouches for.

`_dangling` now reads two sources with one rule: the graph's own dangling
rows (filtered to evidenced edges, as before) plus every end of an evidenced
edge whose ref points at an `unknown_block`, at that inferred port's x/y.
The `nearest` hint is computed the way the graph computes it for a free end
(nearest port within 10·tolerance, same space), over recognised nodes' ports
only, so the invented `p1` can never be the suggested fix; `detail["touches"]`
names the block the end sits on. The other direction is unchanged: a note
leader whose only anchor is an unknown_block is not evidenced and stays out.

Tests: the reviewer's repro (landing on the frame → error; graph attaches it,
dangling=[]), the stop-short control, the finalize gate raising on it, and
the nearest-port hint naming a catalogue valve's port 1 mm away rather than
the frame's inferred port.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
2026-09-16 11:51:22 +03:00
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 715c8efca4 fix(task-16): P&ID focuses score evidence, never a 0.3 touch guess or an inferred port kind
Two ways the six focuses turned a reader guess into a gate-failing error:

- The "no P&ID content" guard was `not graph["nodes"]`, but build_graph
  (include_foreign=True) files ANY INSERT as an `unknown_block` at 0.3 the
  moment a plain LINE's end lands on its box. A bolt with a note leader on a
  purely mechanical sheet became a P&ID node, the leader a foreign edge, and
  its free end a `pid_dangling_line` error — so drawing_finalize (focus=None)
  failed a sheet the seven mechanical focuses pass. Now `has_pid_content`
  needs a recognised node (catalog / xdata / heuristic); an `unknown_block`
  is never tagged or scored, and `_dangling` only reports an edge that is a
  P&ID line by evidence (a class from XDATA or a P&ID layer, or an end on a
  recognised node) — on a real P&ID the same leader is not dangling either.

- `_incompatible` read `port["kind"]` off inferred ports, which the graph
  hard-codes to "process" for every foreign block. A signal line correctly
  drawn to a CTO control valve's actuator was an error whose hint said to
  redraw the control signal as a process line. Inferred ports are skipped;
  only a declared (catalogue / XDATA) port kind is judged.

Tests: both repros as regressions (unit + the server drawing_finalize gate),
a foreign GATE_VALVE whose dangling line is still reported (the heuristic
path spec §9.3 pins is not silenced), a note leader on a real P&ID, and the
spec's own negative — all six return [] on the README gear sheet.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
2026-09-16 11:35:35 +03:00
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 b4c1423c8e feat(pid): six P&ID critique focuses join drawing_finalize; plan/preflight flag a P&ID intent on the wrong layer set
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
2026-09-16 11:17:55 +03:00
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 346eac4ac6 fix(task-15): instrument connected_to follows junction ends and never names its own wire
instrument_index only resolved {"node"} ends of a signal line, so a
transmitter tapping the middle of a pipe (a {"junction"} end) reported
connected_to="" and an instrument on untagged equipment fell back to the
signal line's own number — which Task 13 always stamps, so the handle
fallback was unreachable and every untagged mounting was labelled with
its wire. Spec 9.5's "line numbers" clause is exactly the junction case.

_far_ends now names the far node's tag (its handle when untagged) and,
at a junction, the line number of every line the junction joins (that
line's handle when unnumbered). Two tests exercise both mountings.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
2026-09-16 11:02:11 +03:00
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 4e523ac6ed feat(pid): instrument index, line list and equipment list from the graph
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
2026-09-16 10:49:30 +03:00
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 6ad3734c47 fix(task-14): per-space resolution, mirrored inserts, tags above the box, per-axis scale
Closes the four verified BLOCKING findings on pid_graph.

1. scope="all" attached across layouts: the port grid, bbox candidates,
   vertex grid, junctions and text lookup were pooled from every space.
   The grid is now keyed by (space, cell) and every lookup filters by the
   edge's space; junctions carry `space`.
2. A mirrored INSERT (extrusion -Z, as MIRROR3D / foreign DXFs store it)
   got its catalogue ports on the unmirrored image at 1.0. Both engines
   report `mirrored` on INSERT properties (ezdxf: extrusion z < 0; COM:
   Normal z < 0; default False); transform_port takes `mirrored` and
   applies x -> -x about the WCS insertion point after rotation/scale,
   direction (180 - d) mod 360 — cross-checked against Insert.matrix44.
   resolve_endpoint passes it through too, so draw_line starts on the
   mirror image as well.
3. The text-tag fallback searched a full circle around the box top, so a
   line label or note below the symbol beat the tag above it. Candidates
   must now sit at or above top - height/2 (spec §9.2 step 6), nearest
   wins, and line-number texts are never equipment tags.
4. A non-uniform INSERT scale re-ran the transform with the X factor and
   set `inferred` (reserved for foreign-block ports). transform_port
   gains `strict=False` for the reader: point ports scale per axis
   exactly; a radial port keeps min(sx, sy)·r and the node drops to 0.6
   with notes ["non-uniform scale"]. Node dicts gain `y_scale`,
   `mirrored` and `notes` (default []).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
2026-09-16 10:35:20 +03:00
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 ea47cbdd7e fix(task-14): a border INSERT is not a port, and a turned symbol's box is its geometry
Two verified blocking findings on pid_graph.

A foreign block's inferred ports were any line end within tolerance of
its drawn box *or strictly inside it*. A sheet border or title block is
an INSERT too, and its box encloses the whole drawing, so every end that
missed a port attached to the border instead of becoming the junction
or dangling end the tool exists to report: on a border sheet the plan's
own small P&ID read back with no junction, no dangling end and its open
signal line "connected" to A3_BORDER. The test is the boundary again, as
spec 9.2 step 3 says (within tolerance of the block's bounding-box
boundary); overshoot into a body is the tolerance's business. The
nearest-insertion tie-break stays for two boundaries that share an end.

The COM engine's `geometry_bbox` carried each definition member's own
axis-aligned box through the INSERT corner by corner, which is exact at
a right-angle rotation and too large everywhere else: a 45-degree-turned
circle of radius 5 read as 7.07, a diagonal line stood upright read 7.07
wide, and the two engines disagreed on the same drawing with no marker.
Off a right angle the member's real geometry is now measured - a LINE,
POINT and straight polyline by their vertices, a CIRCLE by the
closed-form extents of the scaled-and-turned ellipse, an ARC and a
bulged polyline by their ends and the quadrant points the sweep passes
(uniform scale, reflection reversing the sense) - and cross-checked
against ezdxf's `virtual_entities` extents at 37 and 45 degrees, scaled
and mirrored. A member that cannot be measured (text, hatch, a nested
reference, an elliptical arc) is still carried by its corners and the
box then says `approximate: true`; the graph takes the tighter wall of
that box and the attribute-inclusive `bounding_box`, both of which hold
the drawn geometry.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
2026-09-16 10:09:04 +03:00
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 d17a26103f fix(task-14): arcs past a semicircle and foreign ports behind tag text
Two verified blocking findings on pid_graph.

`_point_segment_distance` put the centre of an arc larger than a
semicircle (|bulge| > 1) on the wrong side of the chord: `copysign`
discarded the sign of `radius - sagitta`, which is exactly what carries
the centre across the chord past 180 degrees. A bulge-2 arc was tested
as its own reflection, so a line ending on its true apex dangled and one
ending on empty paper made a junction. The offset now keeps that sign
and only takes the bulge's direction from the bulge.

Foreign-block port inference tested line ends against the INSERT's
`bounding_box`, which on both engines takes the ATTRIB text with it. A
TAG lettered above a valve pushed the box past the body, so a line
ending on the body's real edge on that side was *inside* the box and
reported dangling. Both engines now report `geometry_bbox` for an
INSERT - the drawn geometry only, ATTRIB/ATTDEF excluded, in WCS, omitted
when the block draws nothing (ezdxf via `virtual_entities`, COM by
carrying each definition member's box through the INSERT's origin,
scale and rotation). The graph prefers it over `bounding_box`, counts
an end as touching when it is within tolerance of the box or inside it,
and when several foreign boxes hold the end picks the nearest insertion.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
2026-09-16 09:53:24 +03:00
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 8fcd587b5b fix(task-14): foreign-line membership before junctions, and edges measure the arc the drawing holds
Two reader defects, both about trusting a derived number over the drawing.

Stale junctions: endpoints were resolved before a foreign line's membership
was decided, so a P&ID line ending on a foreign line that was then discarded
(it touched no node) kept `{"junction": "J1"}` while `junctions` was empty
and `stats.dangling` was one short. Node attachment now runs first for every
edge, the foreign lines that attach are admitted, and only then are junctions
and dangling ends resolved over the edges actually in the graph.

Chord length: `length` was a chord walk over the vertices, 12.5% short on a
semicircular crossing jump with no field saying so, and junction detection
tested the chord too, so a line ending on the arc dangled. Both engines now
report per-vertex `bulges` next to `points` (COM asks GetBulge only when
`Length` exceeds the chord walk, since an arc is always longer than its
chord); the reader takes the engine's bulge-aware `length` and tests
endpoints against the arc. The chord sum survives only for an engine that
reports no length, and is then labelled `length_approximate`.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
2026-09-16 00:30:21 +03:00
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 e246b5e86a feat(pid): pid_graph reads the drawing back with ports, junctions, dangling ends and confidence
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
2026-09-16 00:13:42 +03:00
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 e924b5db99 fix(task-13): mirrored-symbol ports and COM-visible existing lines
Two review findings on pid_line_draw, both root-caused:

1. existing_pid_lines() filtered entity_list(type_filter="LWPOLYLINE") and
   tested info.type == "LWPOLYLINE". A live LWPOLYLINE's ActiveX ObjectName
   is AcDbPolyline (the repo's own 2026-08-06 measurement), which the COM
   engine reports as POLYLINE, so on live AutoCAD every auto-built number was
   seq 1, crossings always 0 and port_reuse always []. The reader now lists
   without a type filter and accepts {LWPOLYLINE, POLYLINE, 2DPOLYLINE} plus
   LINE — the same set the Task 14 graph reader keeps. The COM _entity_info
   polyline branch matched only the DXF-flavoured "AcDbLWPolyline", so a live
   LWPOLYLINE never got `points` either; it now accepts both spellings (with
   the OCS normalisation), which is what makes the crossing count real there.

2. resolve_endpoint() applied only x_scale, so a mirrored INSERT
   (entity_mirror writes y_scale = -1) resolved its port to a point off the
   symbol and the line was drawn through the pump body. transform_port takes
   an optional y_scale (default: uniform, signature unchanged) and applies the
   full reflect-then-rotate transform to point, direction and radius; a
   stretched symbol (|x_scale| != |y_scale|) has no circle for a radial port
   and is refused with a clear ValueError instead of a silent wrong number.

Tests: mirror about both axes resolves onto the real geometry, a stretched
copy is refused, and a fake-COM AcDbPolyline probe sees the existing line
with its seq, vertices and from-ref.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
2026-09-15 23:48:35 +03:00
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 e8f1a666f8 feat(pid): pid_line_draw — port-to-port orthogonal lines with class, number, markers
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
2026-09-15 23:26:09 +03:00
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 4b6abf7b92 feat(pid): pid_symbol_list and pid_symbol_insert — blocks with tags, ports and XDATA
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
2026-09-15 16:44:06 +03:00
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 8a3b8735b9 fix(task-10): nozzle stubs meet the drawn outline, impossible capsules and nozzle typos refused
Nozzle stubs started at the bounding-box edge, so on a dished head, a
hopper's sloped wall or a cone roof they floated off the vessel (default
horizontal_vessel N3/N4 by 0.8 mm, reactor N3/N4 by 0.06 mm, unbounded for
user fractions). The port now stays STUB outside the bbox and the stub is
drawn from there in to where its axis-aligned line meets the outline, via a
new geometry.scan_hits helper; jacketed reactors' stubs pass through the
jacket to the wall.

validate_vessel_params refuses height <= width for vertical capsules
(vertical_vessel, column, reactor), width <= height for horizontal_vessel
and height <= width/6 for a cone-roof tank: those folded the heads through
each other and produced geometry outside the declared bbox. Unknown keys
inside a nozzle dict are refused naming nozzles[i] and the key, like the
top-level parameters already were.

Tests: a fuzz over every accepted vessel shape x 28 nozzle positions checks
the declared bbox and that each stub's inner end lies on the outline (exact
point-to-arc/segment distance); the default-symbol repros and the refusals
are pinned. 137 of the new cases fail against the previous module.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
2026-09-15 16:26:00 +03:00
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 661258004f feat(pid): six parametric vessel symbols with nozzle ports
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
2026-09-15 16:12:15 +03:00
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 240d9b3d9d feat(pid): rotating, heat-transfer and inline equipment symbols
Task 9 of the v1.6 P&ID plan: engineering/pid/symbols_equipment.py fills
the stub with three ISO 10628-2 families registered on import — rotating
(centrifugal_pump, pd_pump, compressor, fan, agitator, ejector), heat
(shell_tube_hx, plate_hx, air_cooler, fired_heater) and misc inline
fittings (filter, strainer_y, reducer with shape=concentric|eccentric,
flange_pair, spectacle_blind, orifice_plate with a signal port,
drain_vent). Every port sits on the declared bbox edge and every symbol
carries the TAG/DESC attribute pair; the catalogue harness now covers
103 specs.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
2026-09-15 16:02:54 +03:00
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 352ce21030 fix(task-8): actuators stack on the body's real top and every stem meets its glyph
Two authoring slips in the valve x actuator composition:

- The diaphragm actuator's stem stopped at y=4 while the dome's flat base
  sat at y=6, so the canonical control-valve symbol (PID_VALVE_*_DIAPHRAGM,
  9 catalogue entries) shipped with its dome floating 2 mm above the stem.
- Actuators were placed at a fixed y=4 regardless of the body, so on the
  needle body (top 5.6) the piston/motor/solenoid glyphs were drawn over
  the knob and the hand bar across the needle's stem; the stem line(0,0,0,4)
  also duplicated the needle's own axial line (and the butterfly disc).

Placement is now body-relative: `_body` reports `axis_top` (where its own
geometry on x=0 ends) and the stem runs from there to the glyph base at
`body_top + STEM_CLEARANCE`; the diaphragm dome's base is the stem top
(base + DIAPHRAGM_YOKE), and the FAIL attribute follows the glyph base.
The reference 8x4 bodies keep their published numbers (globe+diaphragm
signal at y=9.0, bbox top 9.0).

Tests: per-combination check that the stem starts at the body's derived
axis top, the glyph's lowest edge equals the stem top, the glyph clears
the body, and the signal port is the topmost edge; plus a catalogue-wide
no-duplicate-primitives gate. 33 combinations fail on the old geometry.
The plan's Step 3 snippet is synced with the fixed module.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
2026-09-15 15:51:20 +03:00
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 41e60bd4d0 feat(pid): 11 ISO 10628-2 valve bodies composed with 6 ISA-5.1 actuators
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
2026-09-15 15:37:46 +03:00
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 cb23f31700 fix(task-7): instrument bubble outline per ISA-5.1 Table 5.4.1, location lines clipped to the outline
build_instrument drew a circle for every type, so `computer` shipped as
circle + hexagon and `plc` as circle + square + diamond (10 of the 20 bubble
blocks wrong, and the circle poked 0.67 mm outside the hexagon's flat top).
Spec 4.4: discrete = circle; dcs = circle inside a square; computer =
hexagon; plc = diamond inside a square. The outline is now chosen per type.

Location lines were always drawn from -r to +r, overshooting the hexagon's
slanted sides by 0.46 mm at y=+/-0.8 and the circle's chord by 0.06 mm.
They now end on the outline (`_bubble_half_width`): chord for the circle,
full width for the square, `r - |y| / tan 60` for the hexagon.

Tests now assert the exact primitive list per type and that every location
line stays on/inside its outline (both fail against the previous code).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
2026-09-15 15:27:23 +03:00
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 6cccadee84 feat(pid): symbol catalogue framework — instruments, markers, connectors
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
2026-09-15 15:14:55 +03:00
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 a0b16f399b feat(pid): ACADMCP_PID payload encoding with 255-char chunking
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
2026-09-15 15:04:01 +03:00
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 94840042a5 merge: track-a task 12
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
2026-09-15 13:44:57 +03:00
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 2833e1bc93 fix(task-12): refuse non-finite points, non-axis ports and unfillable number formats
Three ways `engineering/pid/lines.py` could emit a silent wrong result or
an opaque crash instead of an honest refusal:

- `format_line_number` only recognised a token that was exactly `{field}`;
  `P-{seq:04d}`, `{size}"-{service}` or `{bogus}x` were copied verbatim,
  braces and all, into the line number. Tokens are now parsed with
  `string.Formatter`: one named known field per token, a format spec is
  honoured (`{seq:04d}` -> `0007`), literal decoration around the field
  survives with it and drops out with it, and conversions, positional
  fields, multi-field tokens, unbalanced braces and specs the value cannot
  take are all refused by token name.
- `route` never checked finiteness: a NaN `end` collapsed the U candidate
  to a valid two-point "straight" path ending at the stub point. Every
  coordinate of start/end/waypoints and the stub are now checked and the
  refusal names the offending `end.x` / `waypoints[1].y` / stub.
- A non-axis port direction (45.0, 90.5, nan) raised `KeyError` from the
  AXIS lookup. `axis_direction()` now normalises with a 1e-6 deg tolerance
  for engine drift and otherwise raises ValueError naming `start_dir` /
  `end_dir` and how to resolve it (rotate to a multiple of 90 or pass
  waypoints).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
2026-09-15 13:30:02 +03:00
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 b8de3968f9 feat(pid): ISA-5.1 identification-letter grammar with a pinned fixture
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
2026-09-15 13:14:12 +03:00
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 6dd25ff0c2 feat(pid): line classes, orthogonal routing, labels, markers, crossings
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
2026-09-15 13:11:59 +03:00