Two verified blocking findings on pid_graph.
A foreign block's inferred ports were any line end within tolerance of
its drawn box *or strictly inside it*. A sheet border or title block is
an INSERT too, and its box encloses the whole drawing, so every end that
missed a port attached to the border instead of becoming the junction
or dangling end the tool exists to report: on a border sheet the plan's
own small P&ID read back with no junction, no dangling end and its open
signal line "connected" to A3_BORDER. The test is the boundary again, as
spec 9.2 step 3 says (within tolerance of the block's bounding-box
boundary); overshoot into a body is the tolerance's business. The
nearest-insertion tie-break stays for two boundaries that share an end.
The COM engine's `geometry_bbox` carried each definition member's own
axis-aligned box through the INSERT corner by corner, which is exact at
a right-angle rotation and too large everywhere else: a 45-degree-turned
circle of radius 5 read as 7.07, a diagonal line stood upright read 7.07
wide, and the two engines disagreed on the same drawing with no marker.
Off a right angle the member's real geometry is now measured - a LINE,
POINT and straight polyline by their vertices, a CIRCLE by the
closed-form extents of the scaled-and-turned ellipse, an ARC and a
bulged polyline by their ends and the quadrant points the sweep passes
(uniform scale, reflection reversing the sense) - and cross-checked
against ezdxf's `virtual_entities` extents at 37 and 45 degrees, scaled
and mirrored. A member that cannot be measured (text, hatch, a nested
reference, an elliptical arc) is still carried by its corners and the
box then says `approximate: true`; the graph takes the tighter wall of
that box and the attribute-inclusive `bounding_box`, both of which hold
the drawn geometry.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
