Umut CANandClaude Opus 5.5
898e775f93
The evidence for tracks B and G, in the shape tracks A and E used.
- benchmarks/tasks_v5.py: 18 tasks, DEFAULT_MATRIX = "v5"; v4, v3 and v2 stay
addressable so an earlier report reproduces exactly rather than being only
described. mech_assembly is roadmap criterion 3 - a flange-coupling sheet
built from the part model and the sheet standard, through the code the
tools call (apply_titleblock, draw_part/add_view/dimension_part,
insert_std_part, extract_records -> draw_bom_table, add_balloon), gated on
two numbers that cannot be negotiated: drawing_critique(focus=None) returns
zero issues and the finalize score is at least 90 (it scores 100, 18/18 on
the v5 matrix). The adapter returns the focuses that fired, so a
regression names itself, and a test drops one balloon to prove the gate
fails and names mech_bom_balloon_mismatch.
- Seven correctness checks (32 -> 39). mech_section_hatch_area is the one
that cannot be faked: a sleeve of length 60, outside diameter 40 and bore
20 cuts two faces totalling 1200 mm^2 exactly, read back out of the drawing
through entity_measure. sheet_frame_iso5457_a3 pins the A3 frame (20,10 to
410,287 inside the 420 x 297 trimmed sheet); mech_iso286_on_dimension pins
40 H7 at +0.025/0 through the layout; std_part_iso4014_m12 pins s = 18 and
k = 7.5 by value; mech_thread_unrepresented_is_caught is the seventh: a
quality gate that never fires is not a gate.
- scripts/smoke_mech_com.py executed every new COM path once on AutoCAD 2026
(25.1s): frame, title block, a sectioned shaft with 12 dimensions, an ISO
4014 block with 1 ACADMCP_MECH chunk, a weld symbol, the parts list read off
the drawing, a linked balloon, an xref attached / listed / detached, a
31687-byte .dwg (AC1032) through ActiveX SaveAs, critique 0 issues, exit 0,
every scratch document closed. It retries RPC_E_CALL_REJECTED (measured:
the first call after Documents.Add is refused) and tracks its documents by
the document list, since SaveAs renames them.
- Defects the evidence found, each fixed with a test that fails on the old
code:
* ezdxf dimension_diameter put the text beyond the SECOND chord point;
ActiveX AddDimDiametric puts it beyond the first (measured live: a d50
from (x,170) to (x,220), leader 10, text at (x,160)). Headlessly every
front-view diameter stood on its own chain dimension. ezdxf now follows
ActiveX.
* draw_part's anchor goes on MECH; ActiveX refuses entity.Layer on a
missing layer (measured -0x7ffdfff7 'Key not found'). draw.py ensures
every target layer before the first entity.
* bom.extract_records filtered on INSERT; ActiveX names it BLOCKREFERENCE
(ObjectName AcDbBlockReference) - the live parts list was empty.
* COM _entity_info reported no dimension text_position: ModelSpace.Item
narrows to IAcadEntity, which has no TextPosition (measured
AttributeError); read through _com_unnarrow (TextPosition measured on
AcDbDiametricDimension, WCS). dim_overlap compared bbox centres and a
diameter collided with its own bore.
* pid graph raised KeyError 'start' mid-critique on a LINE whose point read
AutoCAD refused while busy; such a line is left out.
* the validator read "ISO 4014 - M12x60" as fake dimension text.
- The published A/B report is re-run over the grown suite rather than
re-typed (26/39 -> 39/39, 13 fixed, 0 regressed), check_doc_numbers derives
the task count from the v5 matrix, the token table is remeasured with a
TOOL_PACKS=core,mech row (193 tools / 61,673 tokens), and the README's
collected-tests figure is retaken (3990).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
51 lines
1.7 KiB
Python
51 lines
1.7 KiB
Python
"""The v5 task matrix: v4 plus what tracks B and G added.
|
|
|
|
``mech_assembly`` (tracks B + G) is roadmap criterion 3: a flange-coupling
|
|
sheet built from the tools — two parts with a section, a bolt circle of ISO
|
|
4014 bolts and ISO 4032 nuts, ISO 129 dimensions, an ISO 5457 A3 frame, an
|
|
ISO 7200 title block and an ISO 7573 parts list with balloons. The gate is two
|
|
numbers, not an impression: ``drawing_critique(focus=None)`` returns zero
|
|
issues and the finalize score is at least 90. Either one slipping fails the
|
|
task outright.
|
|
|
|
The published competitor reports were never asked this question; the chart
|
|
shows ``not_run`` for them, not zero.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
from benchmarks.tasks_v2 import TASKS_V2
|
|
from benchmarks.tasks_v3 import TASKS_V3
|
|
from benchmarks.tasks_v4 import TASKS_V4, TaskSpec
|
|
|
|
#: Added in v1.6.0 by tracks B + G.
|
|
NEW_TASKS_V5: tuple[TaskSpec, ...] = (
|
|
TaskSpec(
|
|
"mech_assembly",
|
|
"mech",
|
|
"Draw a flange-coupling sheet from the part model and the sheet standard, "
|
|
"with a clean critique and a finalize score of at least 90",
|
|
1.0,
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
TASKS_V5: tuple[TaskSpec, ...] = TASKS_V4 + NEW_TASKS_V5
|
|
|
|
#: Runner-selectable task sets. v2, v3 and v4 stay addressable so an earlier
|
|
#: report can be reproduced exactly rather than only described.
|
|
MATRICES: dict[str, tuple[TaskSpec, ...]] = {
|
|
"v2": TASKS_V2,
|
|
"v3": TASKS_V3,
|
|
"v4": TASKS_V4,
|
|
"v5": TASKS_V5,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
DEFAULT_MATRIX = "v5"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def task_by_id(task_id: str, matrix: str = DEFAULT_MATRIX) -> TaskSpec:
|
|
for task in MATRICES[matrix]:
|
|
if task.task_id == task_id:
|
|
return task
|
|
raise KeyError(f"{task_id} is not in matrix {matrix}")
|