The v1.6 roadmap in five tracks: 154 -> 247 registered tools in 28 groups.
Evidence re-measured for the release:
- correctness A/B against v1.5.1: 26/48 -> 48/48, 22 fixed, 0 regressed
(ab-v1.5.1-vs-v1.6.0.json, replacing the -dev report);
- the reference adapter on matrix v7: 21/21 (autocad-mcp-pro.json, which
was the v3 run of 1.5); the published-report test follows it to v7;
- the 100-point rubric re-scored per category, every withheld point named:
93 (the competitor rows are their July snapshots, not re-reviewed);
- the perf lane as medians of five alternating runs, beside a v1.4.0
comparison on one interpreter (perf-v1.4.0-vs-v1.6.0.json).
Two roadmap criteria are not green, and the changelog, the README and the
roadmap say so: criterion 5 is withdrawn (track D, Plant 3D, dropped) and
criterion 7 is not met (creation 1.25x / 1.38x v1.4.0's time, still
1.17x / 1.20x with the timeout off). Carried to 1.7.
README rewritten for 1.6: what is new, the mechanical and architectural
sheets, the rubric and task-matrix charts, the measured limits (including
the four feature tables that ship empty), and the 1.7 roadmap. server.json
describes the 1.6 surface and declares TOOL_PACKS. CLAUDE.md corrects the
ISO 286 letter set and the empty feature tables.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
Research snapshot of the AutoCAD MCP field (20 READMEs, 2026-09-14), the
seven 1.6 tracks with measurable acceptance criteria, their order
(A -> E -> B -> G -> F -> H -> D), and the tool-pack decision.
Track A: symbol catalogue authored in code (ISO 10628-2 + ISA-5.1), two
generic contracts (block_define, entity_get/set_xdata), nine pid_* tools,
routing, the ISA-5.1 tag grammar, the pid_graph reader, six critique
focuses, TOOL_PACKS, and the test/evidence plan.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
