835bc4b65e2cadb7b74e7a5b52dd0608f6d4cc86
6
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Umut CANandClaude Opus 5.5
|
0abbe55041 |
bench: matrix v6 adds arch_roundtrip; four architectural correctness checks; the live arch smoke
The evidence for track F, in the shape tracks A, E and B + G used. - benchmarks/tasks_v6.py: 19 tasks, DEFAULT_MATRIX = "v6"; v5 to v2 stay addressable. arch_roundtrip draws the example plan with arch_plan_from_spec and reads it back without the spec: rooms_detect must find each labelled room within 0.1 % of its label and of the net floor computed by hand (4825 x 5750 and 3825 x 5750), the schedules must list D1, D2, W1, W2, and the plan is gated on a zero-issue critique and a finalize score of at least 90. A test removes one room label and the gate fails naming arch_room_unlabelled. - Four correctness checks, every number worked out by hand in the docstring: L / T / X junction corners and wall areas, a 4 x 5 m room labelled 20.00 m2 rather than its 21.84 m2 axis area, a door interrupting both faces, and a plan of plain lines read as 20 and 15 m2 at confidence 0.6. The published A/B report is re-run over 43 checks: 26 / 43 -> 43 / 43, zero regressed. - scripts/smoke_arch_com.py runs the whole plan once on a live seat and closes every document it opens; the CHANGELOG records what it returned. - The token suite measures a TOOL_PACKS=core,arch row; check_doc_numbers derives the task count from the v6 matrix; CLAUDE.md, both READMEs and the spec status line say what shipped. - fix(com): the first live smoke exited 1 - the room reader found 0 wall segments. Measured on AutoCAD 2026 (2026-09-23): with a makepy cache, ModelSpace.Item(i) returns the gen_py IAcadEntity wrapper (type(item).__name__ == "IAcadEntity") and item.StartPoint on an AcDbLine raises AttributeError, so every entity_list row lost its type-specific properties (28 wall LINEs, 0 with start/end). _entity_info now re-dispatches exactly that wrapper through _com_unnarrow; after the fix 38 of 53 rows carry start/end and the smoke exits 0 with both rooms at 27 743 750 / 21 993 750 mm2 and 0 critique issues. Re-dispatch measured at ~1.7 ms per entity (dynamic vs gencache alike). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd |
||
|
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5.5
|
898e775f93 |
bench: matrix v5 adds mech_assembly; the correctness suite grows with the mechanical and sheet checks
The evidence for tracks B and G, in the shape tracks A and E used.
- benchmarks/tasks_v5.py: 18 tasks, DEFAULT_MATRIX = "v5"; v4, v3 and v2 stay
addressable so an earlier report reproduces exactly rather than being only
described. mech_assembly is roadmap criterion 3 - a flange-coupling sheet
built from the part model and the sheet standard, through the code the
tools call (apply_titleblock, draw_part/add_view/dimension_part,
insert_std_part, extract_records -> draw_bom_table, add_balloon), gated on
two numbers that cannot be negotiated: drawing_critique(focus=None) returns
zero issues and the finalize score is at least 90 (it scores 100, 18/18 on
the v5 matrix). The adapter returns the focuses that fired, so a
regression names itself, and a test drops one balloon to prove the gate
fails and names mech_bom_balloon_mismatch.
- Seven correctness checks (32 -> 39). mech_section_hatch_area is the one
that cannot be faked: a sleeve of length 60, outside diameter 40 and bore
20 cuts two faces totalling 1200 mm^2 exactly, read back out of the drawing
through entity_measure. sheet_frame_iso5457_a3 pins the A3 frame (20,10 to
410,287 inside the 420 x 297 trimmed sheet); mech_iso286_on_dimension pins
40 H7 at +0.025/0 through the layout; std_part_iso4014_m12 pins s = 18 and
k = 7.5 by value; mech_thread_unrepresented_is_caught is the seventh: a
quality gate that never fires is not a gate.
- scripts/smoke_mech_com.py executed every new COM path once on AutoCAD 2026
(25.1s): frame, title block, a sectioned shaft with 12 dimensions, an ISO
4014 block with 1 ACADMCP_MECH chunk, a weld symbol, the parts list read off
the drawing, a linked balloon, an xref attached / listed / detached, a
31687-byte .dwg (AC1032) through ActiveX SaveAs, critique 0 issues, exit 0,
every scratch document closed. It retries RPC_E_CALL_REJECTED (measured:
the first call after Documents.Add is refused) and tracks its documents by
the document list, since SaveAs renames them.
- Defects the evidence found, each fixed with a test that fails on the old
code:
* ezdxf dimension_diameter put the text beyond the SECOND chord point;
ActiveX AddDimDiametric puts it beyond the first (measured live: a d50
from (x,170) to (x,220), leader 10, text at (x,160)). Headlessly every
front-view diameter stood on its own chain dimension. ezdxf now follows
ActiveX.
* draw_part's anchor goes on MECH; ActiveX refuses entity.Layer on a
missing layer (measured -0x7ffdfff7 'Key not found'). draw.py ensures
every target layer before the first entity.
* bom.extract_records filtered on INSERT; ActiveX names it BLOCKREFERENCE
(ObjectName AcDbBlockReference) - the live parts list was empty.
* COM _entity_info reported no dimension text_position: ModelSpace.Item
narrows to IAcadEntity, which has no TextPosition (measured
AttributeError); read through _com_unnarrow (TextPosition measured on
AcDbDiametricDimension, WCS). dim_overlap compared bbox centres and a
diameter collided with its own bore.
* pid graph raised KeyError 'start' mid-critique on a LINE whose point read
AutoCAD refused while busy; such a line is left out.
* the validator read "ISO 4014 - M12x60" as fake dimension text.
- The published A/B report is re-run over the grown suite rather than
re-typed (26/39 -> 39/39, 13 fixed, 0 regressed), check_doc_numbers derives
the task count from the v5 matrix, the token table is remeasured with a
TOOL_PACKS=core,mech row (193 tools / 61,673 tokens), and the README's
collected-tests figure is retaken (3990).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
|
||
|
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5
|
8d9c444b76 |
bench: matrix v4 adds pid_roundtrip; correctness suite grows to 29 with three P&ID checks
tasks_v4.py extends v3 with one task the reader can fail on its own: the example spec is drawn through pid_from_spec's code and read back by the graph builder, which never sees the spec. The runner, the chart and the doc-number gate now default to v4; --matrix v3 / v2 reproduce the earlier sets, and tests/test_benchmark_v3.py labels its full-matrix run "v3" explicitly now that the default has moved. The plan's adapter check expected the two unnumbered lines to come back with no line number; draw_line builds one from the default number_format (bare sequence when size/service/spec/insulation are empty), so the task asserts the two authored numbers on the two process lines and sequence- built XDATA numbers on the other two instead. The published A/B report still covers 26 checks; Task 21 re-runs it against v1.5.1, which is what clears the remaining doc-number drift. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd |
||
|
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5
|
b03a7615b1 |
release: v1.5.0 — discovery layer, honesty debt closed, Wave A
Tool count 131 -> 154; 474 -> 1242 collected tests. The release exists for two measured reasons. A 149-tool catalog costs a client ~40,300 tokens before it has asked for anything, and a drafter searching the way drafters think -- FILLET, BPOLY, QSELECT, WBLOCK -- scored df=0 against the stock index, because those words were simply not in the data. Discovery and batching - DISCOVERY_MODE=search replaces the catalog with search_tools + call_tool, ranked over an AutoCAD command and synonym corpus (discovery/aliases.py) on top of fastmcp's BM25 index. Measured: 40,305 -> 356 tokens advertised. - cad_batch runs a step list in one round trip; fields= projects result-heavy responses. The `core` profile is gone -- discovery replaced it. Honesty debt (Tier 0) - OCS/ECS: `extrusion` appeared nowhere in this codebase, so mirrored and rotated geometry reported coordinates that were quietly wrong. backends/ocs.py translates at the backend boundary; every tool coordinate is WCS on both engines, and a tilted plane refuses rather than answering with a number that looks fine. - drawing_save_as(fmt="dwg") wrote DXF bytes to a .dwg path. drawing_audit never repaired. analysis_measure_area shoelaced points the caller typed in. - ezdxf calls gained a per-call timeout, so one hung call can no longer wedge a server whose document lock is a single asyncio.Lock. Architecture - The 1854-line backend ABC is 19 contract modules; @capability(key, reason=) makes optional methods declarative and a gate fails on undeclared holes. - 8 layout/viewport tools, CHSPACE, CAD_PROGID escape hatch. - Wave A: selection filters, boundary tracing, hatch depth, annotation objects, measurement -- 13 tools of a planned 39. The REGION and 2D-boolean family was cut on evidence: add_region() yields zero ACIS bytes and the greiner_hormann substitute loses 28.2% of the area on a square with one semicircular edge. Verified against a live AutoCAD 2026, which found four COM defects no amount of reading would have caught -- AcadPViewport has no ViewCenter, and the line that set it had been swallowed by a bare except since v1.4. Benchmark v3 (15 tasks) and what it caught - v2 scored this server 10/10, which carried no information: every task in it exercised something the server was built around. Five tasks were added because they can fail, and three did while being written -- a hatch could not be measured though the refusal listed HATCH as measurable, the boundary tools and the measure tool disagreed about the same shape (139.2177 vs 139.2699), and a circle stored as two bulged vertices measured 0.0. - Competitor reports are NOT re-scored. They are pinned v1.4 runs against v2 and were never asked these five questions; the chart shows those rows `not run`. - Correctness A/B: 21/24 -> 24/24, zero regressions. Performance, stated plainly The published v1.4 perf report was recorded on CPython 3.14 and the new one on 3.11.15, so the apparent 2-6x speedup is the interpreter, not this release. Re-measured on one interpreter, v1.5.0 is 28% slower creating entities and 22% slower on the 10k roundtrip. Fully attributed: EZDXF_CALL_TIMEOUT=0 restores v1.4.0's exact numbers. That is the deadlock fix being paid for, the knob is documented, and winning it back is on the 1.6 roadmap. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Umutcan EdizsalanandCursor
|
bae0750d4c |
docs(bench): dark leaderboard styling for all benchmark charts
Leaderboard restyled to the LLM-benchmark look: dark background, rank-numbered labels, per-rank color palette, 'NN / 100 - grade' annotations. The live-run, task-matrix and performance charts share the same dark theme for a consistent README identity. Charts regenerated deterministically from their data files. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> |
||
|
Umutcan EdizsalanandCursor
|
21cbc62df5 |
feat(bench): performance lane + task-matrix chart; docs: README rebuilt around four evidence lanes
- benchmarks/perf_suite.py: fixed headless workloads (2k creates, 10k build/export/reopen, 10k region query, premium quality pass) timed through the same backend methods the tools call; machine fingerprint recorded; self-measurement only - benchmarks/render_perf_chart.py -> docs/assets/autocad-mcp-perf.svg (log-scale wall time) - benchmarks/render_matrix_chart.py -> docs/assets/autocad-mcp-taskmatrix.svg (tasks x servers status heatmap from published reports) - render_live_chart now tolerates other lanes sharing results/published/ - README: PyPI-first install, four-lane benchmark section with Python-generated visuals, v1.4 feature table, updated client/config/roadmap - published perf report: benchmarks/results/published/perf-ezdxf.json Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> |