76e8647e1bb7923c01a9cbd29c0f22dd67e08dce
2
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Umut CANandClaude Opus 5
|
ac6c4075ba |
feat(task-3): the feature catalogue and its standards tables
engineering/mech/features.py is the nineteen typed features of spec section 5,
each answering the same four questions - is my placement legal, what do I
contribute to this view, to a cut face, and what dimension do I want - plus the
five structural hooks the view engine needs: removal_box, radial_edit,
corner_edit, outline_edit and omission. Pure arithmetic; a test asserts emitted
primitive tuples, not a screenshot.
Nothing restates a table the repository already owns: Keyway takes its width
and depth from engineering.keyway (DIN 6885-1) and is refused by name outside
that table's bore range; GearTeeth takes its outline from engineering.gear's
involute generator and is refused when its tip diameter disagrees with the
segment it sits on.
standards/threads.py transcribes ISO 261 Table 1 and Table 2 - first-choice
M1.6-M64 plus second-choice M14/M18/M22/M27/M33/M39/M45/M52/M60 - and computes
ISO 724's basic minor and pitch diameters from ISO 68-1's own formula, pinned
against the published values (M20x2.5 -> 17.294 / 18.376). The remaining
second-choice diameters, every third-choice diameter and fine pitches below M8
are not transcribed and are refused by name, never interpolated. The drawing
rules are ISO 6410: minor at 0.8 x major, a thread-length limit line across the
major, a three-quarter circle in the end view, and an internal thread whose
section hatch runs to the major diameter.
standards/{undercuts,rings,centres,orings}.py ship DIN 509, DIN 471/472,
DIN 332-1 and ISO 3601-2 with their SOURCE, their row-key contract and an
**empty** row set. That is deliberate and is the track's table rule taken at its
word: a row that could not be verified against the standard is not shipped,
because a wrong relief depth or groove diameter is a wrong workshop drawing
while a narrow table is merely narrow. Every lookup is refused by name and says
what to transcribe and where; the features accept explicit dimensions so the
geometry is fully exercised, and DIN 332 form R is refused outright rather than
approximated by the straight 60 degree cone of forms A and B. Filling any of
these tables later is a data edit with no code change, and a shape test already
fails any row that lands without a column the drawing code reads.
Three deviations from the plan text, each measured rather than assumed
(the merge agent should keep exactly one copy of the first):
1. standards/__init__.py (Task 1, on main) refused a registration with no rows
("registered no rows"), which would have made the four not-transcribed
tables impossible to register at all - and registering them is what keeps a
later transcription a data edit. register() now refuses a rows argument that
is not a dict and accepts an empty one; two tests in tests/test_mech_standards.py
pin both halves. No existing test asserted the old refusal.
2. ORingGroove's housing kind is carried by `housing`, not `kind`. A dataclass
field named `kind` overwrites the discriminator _Base.to_dict() writes:
measured, Probe(id='og').to_dict() == {'kind': 'radial', 'id': 'og'}, so
feature_from_dict would then refuse its own payload as an unknown feature
kind and no part carrying an O-ring groove could round-trip through XDATA.
A new test pins the round trip.
3. The plan's end-chamfer test asserted after == (75.0, 10.0) - the corner
itself - and before == (72.0, 8.268), a point on neither surface. The real
edit is before (72.0, 10.0) on the cylinder and after (75.0, 8.268) on the
end face, consistent with the 45-degree start chamfer the same file pins.
The test was corrected to the measured geometry; the behaviour is unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd
|
||
|
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5
|
2bb8044144 |
feat(mech): shared foundation - primitives, XDATA codec, standards registry, ISO 128-50 materials
engineering/mech/ opens with the four modules every track-B/G branch imports, so the four worktrees can be cut from this commit and none of them has to invent a name the others will conflict with. - primitives.py: the typed descriptions the pure modules emit (Line, Arc, Circle, Poly, HatchArea, Text, DimIntent) with bbox / translate / rotate / scale, and ROLE_LAYER - the one place an ISO 128 line role becomes a layer name, so no module hardcodes a layer. The arc bbox sweeps its quadrants: a 0-180 arc reports y=+r, not its endpoints, which is what keeps the view layout from stacking two views on top of each other. - xdata.py: the ACADMCP_MECH codec in Track A's shape - a 1001 application marker, 1000 chunks of at most 255 ASCII characters, the 16 KB per-entity ceiling enforced before anything is written, and a foreign application, a corrupt chunk stream, a wrong version or an unknown kind refused with ValueError instead of decoded into something plausible. - standards/__init__.py: the table registry. A size outside the coverage is refused against the coverage; a size inside it that is not a listed row is refused against the rows. Nothing is interpolated, an ambiguous variant is never resolved by taking the first row, and a registration whose SOURCE does not name the table it was transcribed from is refused. - standards/materials.py: the section-hatch map for nine materials. ISO 128-50 standardises only the general hatching (narrow continuous lines at 45 degrees) - that is acadiso.pat ANSI31 and what engineering/gear.py already draws for steel. The distinguishing symbols are ASME Y14.2M's section lining as shipped in AutoCAD 2026's acadiso.pat, read off the installed file; cast iron's departure from ASME and the absence of any mechanical symbol for concrete and wood are stated in the rows themselves. Angles are 0.0 because the patterns already carry 45 degrees, and the two architectural patterns' scales are derived from the ANSI31 line spacing and recomputed by the test rather than chosen. No tool is registered here. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FKFStjEFzpGyLq5bMpWxTd |