Commit Graph
4 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 4e0f8a90fd fix(ci): uv.lock recorded 1.4.0, so every locked lane died before testing
The v1.5.0 lock was generated before the version bump, so its own
[[package]] entry said autocad-mcp-pro 1.4.0 while pyproject said 1.5.0.
No dependency differed -- the transitive graph is byte-identical -- but
`uv sync --locked` will not re-resolve, so lint, test-linux 3.11,
test-linux 3.12 and test-windows all failed at install before running a
single test.

`uv lock` fixes it in one line. The gate that should have caught it did
not exist: test_release_consistency chains pyproject -> version.py ->
CHANGELOG -> README -> server.json, and the lockfile was the one release
artifact carrying a version string nothing checked. Added
test_uv_lock_records_the_pyproject_version, verified RED against the
broken lock and green against the fixed one.

Reproduced the CI lanes locally into a throwaway environment before
pushing this time: `uv sync --locked --only-group dev`, then
`--locked --extra pdf`, then ruff and pytest under `uv run --no-sync`.
1242 passed, 1 xfailed.

README test-count snapshot 1242 -> 1243 for the new gate.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-06 10:03:29 +03:00
Umut CANandClaude Opus 5 b03a7615b1 release: v1.5.0 — discovery layer, honesty debt closed, Wave A
Tool count 131 -> 154; 474 -> 1242 collected tests.

The release exists for two measured reasons. A 149-tool catalog costs a client
~40,300 tokens before it has asked for anything, and a drafter searching the way
drafters think -- FILLET, BPOLY, QSELECT, WBLOCK -- scored df=0 against the stock
index, because those words were simply not in the data.

Discovery and batching
- DISCOVERY_MODE=search replaces the catalog with search_tools + call_tool,
  ranked over an AutoCAD command and synonym corpus (discovery/aliases.py) on
  top of fastmcp's BM25 index. Measured: 40,305 -> 356 tokens advertised.
- cad_batch runs a step list in one round trip; fields= projects result-heavy
  responses. The `core` profile is gone -- discovery replaced it.

Honesty debt (Tier 0)
- OCS/ECS: `extrusion` appeared nowhere in this codebase, so mirrored and
  rotated geometry reported coordinates that were quietly wrong. backends/ocs.py
  translates at the backend boundary; every tool coordinate is WCS on both
  engines, and a tilted plane refuses rather than answering with a number that
  looks fine.
- drawing_save_as(fmt="dwg") wrote DXF bytes to a .dwg path. drawing_audit never
  repaired. analysis_measure_area shoelaced points the caller typed in.
- ezdxf calls gained a per-call timeout, so one hung call can no longer wedge a
  server whose document lock is a single asyncio.Lock.

Architecture
- The 1854-line backend ABC is 19 contract modules; @capability(key, reason=)
  makes optional methods declarative and a gate fails on undeclared holes.
- 8 layout/viewport tools, CHSPACE, CAD_PROGID escape hatch.
- Wave A: selection filters, boundary tracing, hatch depth, annotation objects,
  measurement -- 13 tools of a planned 39. The REGION and 2D-boolean family was
  cut on evidence: add_region() yields zero ACIS bytes and the greiner_hormann
  substitute loses 28.2% of the area on a square with one semicircular edge.

Verified against a live AutoCAD 2026, which found four COM defects no amount of
reading would have caught -- AcadPViewport has no ViewCenter, and the line that
set it had been swallowed by a bare except since v1.4.

Benchmark v3 (15 tasks) and what it caught
- v2 scored this server 10/10, which carried no information: every task in it
  exercised something the server was built around. Five tasks were added because
  they can fail, and three did while being written -- a hatch could not be
  measured though the refusal listed HATCH as measurable, the boundary tools and
  the measure tool disagreed about the same shape (139.2177 vs 139.2699), and a
  circle stored as two bulged vertices measured 0.0.
- Competitor reports are NOT re-scored. They are pinned v1.4 runs against v2 and
  were never asked these five questions; the chart shows those rows `not run`.
- Correctness A/B: 21/24 -> 24/24, zero regressions.

Performance, stated plainly
The published v1.4 perf report was recorded on CPython 3.14 and the new one on
3.11.15, so the apparent 2-6x speedup is the interpreter, not this release.
Re-measured on one interpreter, v1.5.0 is 28% slower creating entities and 22%
slower on the 10k roundtrip. Fully attributed: EZDXF_CALL_TIMEOUT=0 restores
v1.4.0's exact numbers. That is the deadlock fix being paid for, the knob is
documented, and winning it back is on the 1.6 roadmap.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-06 09:45:20 +03:00
Umutcan EdizsalanandCursor d3e5fe4542 chore: drop stale uv.lock from the repo and gitignore it (regenerate deliberately if adopting uv)
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2026-07-23 15:53:40 +03:00
Umutcan EdizsalanandCursor 21cbc62df5 feat(bench): performance lane + task-matrix chart; docs: README rebuilt around four evidence lanes
- benchmarks/perf_suite.py: fixed headless workloads (2k creates, 10k build/export/reopen, 10k region query, premium quality pass) timed through the same backend methods the tools call; machine fingerprint recorded; self-measurement only
- benchmarks/render_perf_chart.py -> docs/assets/autocad-mcp-perf.svg (log-scale wall time)
- benchmarks/render_matrix_chart.py -> docs/assets/autocad-mcp-taskmatrix.svg (tasks x servers status heatmap from published reports)
- render_live_chart now tolerates other lanes sharing results/published/
- README: PyPI-first install, four-lane benchmark section with Python-generated visuals, v1.4 feature table, updated client/config/roadmap
- published perf report: benchmarks/results/published/perf-ezdxf.json

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2026-07-23 15:53:04 +03:00